Kroll to Sponsor Upcoming HIMSS Executive Briefing Online Event – December 14, 2011

11/16/2011

Mark your calendars for the online HIMSS Executive Briefing event, “Privacy and Security: Practical Solutions for a Changing Landscape,” scheduled for December 14 from 9 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. CST. Kroll’s own Karen Schuler, CFE, will be presenting a session for the event: “HIPAA and HITECH in the Real World,” from noon to 1:00 p.m.

States Continue to Amend Breach Notification Laws, most recently California and Illinois, (part 2)

9/09/2011

California continues to tinker with its notification laws, and as mentioned in the first of this two-part series, these will be effective January 1, 2012. The California amendment requires that breach notification be written in plain language and contain:

  • Name & contact info of the data owner/licensor providing notice
  • Date of the notice
  • List of types of info believed breached
  • Toll-free telephone # and address for credit bureaus if breach exposed SSN, driver’s license or state ID #
  • If available at the time of notice, notice must also contain:
    • General description of breach incident;

Complications and Side Effects – Rules, Regulations and Penalties Continued (part3)

9/01/2011

In the absence of federal action, many states have taken the initiative to address data breaches with their own notification laws. However, to avoid multiple notifications and conflicting obligations, both the Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rules expressly preempt state laws to the extent they conflict with federal requirements. State laws with greater notification requirements are not considered in conflict, though, and must be followed in addition to all federal requirements.[1] To avoid duplicative notifications, the federal government strongly recommends that entities strive to meet federal and state obligations in concert.

The Cure for Regulatory Fever: Causes and Symptoms – Overview (part 1)

8/30/2011

Flu season may be over, but for the health care industry, a more troublesome and persistent threat is just warming up. Regulatory fever, a common side effect of an ailing economy, is now nearly in full swing. Beginning with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, ensuring privacy and security of patient information in the health care industry has been a primary concern for legislators over the past decade and a half. The HIPAA Privacy Rule extends federal protection to personal health information held by covered entities, and is fulfilled by the Security Rule, which prescribes the use of security safeguards to ensure confidentiality is maintained.[1] While HIPAA was a significant step forward in the security of personal health information management, two new regulations are raising the bar even higher in an effort to integrate and benefit from advancements in information technology.

A Dialogue on Personal Health Records

11/05/2010

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is seeking public comment regarding personal health records, now through December 10. Comments can be submitted through the website, on the following topics:

  • Privacy and security and emerging technologies
  • Consumer expectations about collection and use of health information
  • Privacy and security requirements for non-covered entities
  • Any other comments on personal health records (PHRs) and non-covered entities

The ONC is also hosting a day-long public roundtable discussion, Personal Health Records – Understanding the Evolving Landscape. According to the website, the purpose is to “inform ONC’s congressionally mandated report on privacy and security requirements for non-covered entities (non-CEs), with a focus on personal health records (PHRs) and related service providers.”